ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Proposed FY 2027 DOE, NRC budgets ask for less
The White House is requesting $1.5 billion for the Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy in the fiscal year 2027 budget proposal, about 9 percent less than the previous year.
The request from the Trump administration is one of several associated with nuclear energy in the proposal, which was released Friday. Congress still must review and vote on the budget.
J. Hardy, Jr., G. G. Smith, J. A. Mitchell, D. Klein
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 12 | Number 2 | February 1962 | Pages 301-308
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A26071
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Dancoff correction factor (1 − C) for U238 resonance neutron capture was measured for cylindrical, 0.98 cm diameter fuel rods at lattice pitches of 1.81 cm and 1.44 cm. The rods were 1.3% U235, arranged in a hexagonal, H2O-moderated lattice. Measurements were done for three fuel materials: uranium metal, UO2 (density 10.5 gm/cm3), and UO2 (density 7.5 gm/cm3) according to the following method. The ratio of U238 epicadmium neutron capture per atom at rod surface to that at rod center, S/V, was measured, for each fuel composition, at both lattice pitches and in an isolated rod (i.e., no Dancoff interaction). The quantity R ≡ [(S − V)/V]lattice/[(S − V)/V]isolated rod was, within experimental error, the same for all three fuel materials at each lattice pitch. Furthermore, within experimental error, R was found to be equal to (1 − C), calculated at each lattice pitch from Dancoff's expression. This agreement was expected from an analysis of the experiment in terms of a current model of resonance capture which indicated that R equals (1 − C) multiplied by two factors: one accounting for lattice mutual shielding of capture at rod center, the other accounting for the effect on S/V of the resonance flux lethargy tilt (due to loss of neutrons by resonance capture). Approximate calculations of these two effects showed that each perturbs R by about 10% in the worst case. The effects oppose each other so that very closely R = 1 − C.