ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
Zhonglu Wang, Stephen F. Kry, Rebecca M. Howell, Mohammad Salehpour
Nuclear Technology | Volume 168 | Number 3 | December 2009 | Pages 610-614
Neutron Measurements | Special Issue on the 11th International Conference on Radiation Shielding and the 15th Topical Meeting of the Radiation Protection and Shielding Division (PART 3) / Radiation Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT09-A9277
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron spectra and ambient dose equivalent were determined by unfolding measured Bonner sphere system data using different unfolding methods. These methods included a maximum entropy method (MAXED code), nonlinear least-squares method (GRAVEL code) with several different starting spectra, and a genetic algorithm method. These algorithms were used to unfold measured Bonner sphere data that had been collected using a LiI(Eu) detector and activation foils. The Bonner sphere system was exposed to neutrons from a known AmBe source and at the proton accelerator facility at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The total fluence rates and total ambient dose equivalents of the neutron field agree within 7.5%, regardless of unfolding algorithm or starting spectrum. In contrast, the fluence-weighted average energy varied dramatically, depending on the starting spectrum used in the unfolding process. These findings offer insight and guidance into the use of unfolding algorithms and starting spectra for neutron spectroscopy.