ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Researchers use one-of-a-kind expertise and capabilities to test fuels of tomorrow
At the Idaho National Laboratory Hot Fuel Examination Facility, containment box operator Jake Maupin moves a manipulator arm into position around a pencil-thin nuclear fuel rod. He is preparing for a procedure that he and his colleagues have practiced repeatedly in anticipation of this moment in the hot cell.
Sergey S. Gorodkov
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 172 | Number 2 | October 2012 | Pages 193-201
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE11-105
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Significant underprediction bias in uncertainties of neutron flux is observed in Monte Carlo criticality calculations of large cores. It is universally recognized that this underprediction is closely associated with the ratio of the second-largest eigenvalue to the largest eigenvalue, or the dominance ratio, of the fission kernel. In this paper a close analogy is presumed between neutron flux autocorrelations in Monte Carlo calculations and flux variances due to stochastic uncertainties of the properties of fuel assemblies within the manufacturing tolerance limits. Interesting consequences following from this analogy are confirmed in quite realistic calculations. A useful expression is derived for fast evaluation of the minimal number of histories to be modeled to achieve preset confidence limits of flux distribution in large cores.