ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Nano to begin drilling next week in Illinois
It’s been a good month for Nano Nuclear in the state of Illinois. On October 7, the Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the company would be awarded $6.8 million from the Reimagining Energy and Vehicles in Illinois Act to help fund the development of its new regional research and development facility in the Chicago suburb of Oak Brook.
Shu-Chien Yung, Norman P. Wilburn
Nuclear Technology | Volume 47 | Number 1 | January 1980 | Pages 23-38
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT80-A32409
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Intrasubassembly incoherencies affecting the fuel pin failure pattern within a fast test reactor (FTR) subassembly during an unprotected transient overpower/hypothetical core disruptive accident have been investigated using the COBRA-III/MELT code. Two dominant intrasubassembly incoherencies in an FTR subassembly were studied, namely, (a) the hydraulic effect, or the variation in pin-power-to-effective-coolant ratio between pins in the inner region and those in the outer region of the sub-assembly, and (b) the power skew, or variation in pinwise power density for pins throughout the subassembly. The hydraulic effect study concluded that a one-pin representation as used in SAS3A and MELT-IIIA does not represent the fuel pin failure characteristic of any pin in the inner or outer region of the subassembly, but only the failure characteristic of some hypothetical “average” pin, which generally fails much later than most of the pins that actually would fail in the subassembly during the postulated accident. From the power-skew study, it was found that the domain of fuel pin failure times is further widened by the power-skew incoherency. A widened domain of failure times can alleviate molten fuel/coolant interaction by not squirting molten fuel into all coolant subchannels simultaneously. The power skew also produces an eccentric failure pattern within the subassembly that reduces the possibility of a complete fuel blockage.