ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
Hans J. Wingender, R. Leicht
Nuclear Technology | Volume 84 | Number 3 | March 1989 | Pages 260-264
Technical Paper | Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34209
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The modular steady states approach (MSSA) has been developed to meet the particular needs of probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) of facilities at the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. Applicability to front-end facilities can be easily achieved by adding appropriate modules. The MSSA is not intended for nuclear power plant PRA. Atmospheric dispersion and subsequent dose assessments have been treated in the conventional manner. They are not part of the MSSA code package STAR developed for use on an IBM AT-PC. The application of MSSA is demonstrated for a high-level waste storage tank facility. The two principal release paths via the tank off-gas system and the cell exhaust-air system have been investigated. It has been found that component failures with negligible consequences are relatively frequent and typical for the off-gas system. The release risk due to failure is of the same order of magnitude as the release risk due to normal operation. Release via the cell exhaust-air system is possible only after a tank leakage and failure to pump the liquid into a reserve tank, resulting in a very low probability but relatively high release.