ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
60 Years of U: Perspectives on resources, demand, and the evolving role of nuclear energy
Recent years have seen growing global interest in nuclear energy and rising confidence in the sector. For the first time since the early 2000s, there is renewed optimism about the industry’s future. This change is driven by several major factors: geopolitical developments that highlight the need for secure energy supplies, a stronger focus on resilient energy systems, national commitments to decarbonization, and rising demand for clean and reliable electricity.
Kazuo Hiramoto, Motoo Aoyama, Masaharu Sakagami, Renzo Takeda
Nuclear Technology | Volume 64 | Number 3 | March 1984 | Pages 243-248
Technical Paper | Nuclear Fuel | doi.org/10.13182/NT84-A33354
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Low density UO2 fuel pellets of an annular type are used to solve two problems related to high-discharge burnup: the enhancement of the pellet /cladding mechanical interaction, which increases cladding permanent strain, and the increase in average neutron energy due to high enrichment, which changes the core neutronic characteristics. As an example, the design concept is applied to boiling water reactor fuel rods having 57 effective full-power months (EFPMs). The fuel pellet density and the center hole diameter are determined to be 90% TD and 3.0 mm, respectively. The cladding permanent strain of the proposed fuel rod at EFPMs of 57 can be kept lower than the current fuel rod at 36 EFPMs. The EFPMs of 36 and 5 7 correspond respectively to the average discharge burnups of ∼30 and 50 GWd/ tonne U. With an enrichment of 4.5 wt%, the former rods provide the same neutronic characteristics as that of current rods with 2.8 wt% enrichment. Furthermore, power generation cost in the newly designed core is reduced by ∼10% from present cost levels.