ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
S. R. Bierman, K. L. Garlid and R. W. Albrecht
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 22 | Number 2 | June 1965 | Pages 206-214
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A20239
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The complementary nature of pulsed-neutron and reactor-noise techniques in the investigation of reactor dynamic parameters is illuminated by considering the response of a reactor to two types of forcing functions. One of these forcing functions is the impulse function employed in pulsed-neutron studies, while the other is derivable from the inherent randomness of the nuclear events taking place in the reactor. Both the prompt-neutron density following a burst of neutrons into a reactor system and the spectral density of the reactor noise can be expressed in terms of the prompt-neutron decay constant, α. This, in turn, is related to the ratio β/ℓ and the reactivity of the system. Either technique can be used to measure α; however, in practice, each is limited according to a ‘figure of merit’ for a given experimental situation. Measurements made on both subcritical and critical assemblies in the Critical Mass Laboratory at Hanford illustrate the complementary feature of these two techniques and their usefulness in verifying each other's experimental results.