ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
World Bank, IAEA partner to fund nuclear energy
The World Bank and the International Atomic Energy Agency signed an agreement last week to cooperate on the construction and financing of advanced nuclear projects in developing countries, marking the first partnership since the bank ended its ban on funding for nuclear energy projects.
Zbigniew Weiss
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 48 | Number 3 | July 1972 | Pages 235-247
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A22482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In one-dimensional systems which consist of N nodes, the two N response matrix equations for the partial currents through the node interfaces have been transformed into a set of N three-point equations with the total in-current per node as the new variable. The resulting coefficients which describe the coupling between neighboring nodes are expressed in terms of the reflection and transmission matrices of the invariant imbedding theory. These coupling coefficients can be compared with those of other nodal equations. In the case of slab geometry this has been illustrated by a direct comparison with the familiar finite difference formulation with the average flux per node as the dependent variable. Also the relation between the method presented here and the so-called rigorous finite difference equations has been established. The advantage of this method lies in the fact that the flexibility of the response matrix methods—which describe the nodes in terms of invariant imbedding concepts—has been condensed into the conventional three-point finite difference scheme, for which many well-established solution methods exist.