ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
Om Prakash Joneja, Vijay R. Nargundkar, Tejen Kumar Basu
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 12 | Number 1 | July 1987 | Pages 114-118
Technical Paper | Blanket Engineering | doi.org/10.13182/FST87-A25055
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The experimentally measured value of 14-MeV neutron multiplication for 10-cm-thick lead in rectangular geometry agrees within 1% of the corresponding calculated value using the MORSE-E code with the Los Alamos National Laboratory 30-group cross-section set CLAW-IV, in P3 scattering approximation. This result is in direct contrast with Takahashi's measurements with lead spheres of 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-cm radii, where the measured multiplication values are found to be ˜15% higher than the corresponding transport calculations performed using the ANISN and NITRAN codes with the ENDF/B-IV library. However, Monte Carlo calculations using the MORSE-E code with the CLAW-IV library, as well as those of Cheng et al, using the MCNP code with the ENDF/B-V library, agree very well with Takahashi's measurements. Thus, the real difference of leakage neutron multiplication in lead is not between the measurements and the calculations, as reported by Takahashi, but between Takahashi's and other calculations. It is found that by using lead as a neutron multiplier in practical fusion blankets, a 5 to 10% higher neutron multiplication can be obtained than with beryllium for identical configurations of the multiplier.