ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
The transformation of the NRC: 50 years of commissioners
The dust is beginning to settle following the whirlwind of changes at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over the past year, and 2025 ultimately may be viewed as a transformative year, as well as the year the NRC celebrated its golden anniversary. The 12 months of that milestone year brought more change to the agency in its composition, its mandate, and its relationship to the executive branch than any comparable period in the preceding four decades.
Now at 51 years and counting, the NRC is working with a full commission and issuing new rulemakings to both regulate and support the next round of nuclear deployments. With the turbulence of 2025 still fresh in our minds, Nuclear News decided it was a good time to revisit the professional backgrounds of all 42 NRC commissioners who have served over the agency’s 50-year history to see how the composition of the commission has evolved over time.
D. Shome, M. A. R. Sarkar (BUET)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 893-899
The objective of this paper is to present and analyze the results of simulated tube rupture accident in VVER-1000 Nuclear Reactor in PCTRAN. In simulating the accident, 100% of one full tube rupture has been considered. The simulation result shows that the core pressure experience a rapid decrease from initial value of 155 bar (15.5 MPa) and stabilize around 80 bar (8 MPa) after the accident. This leads to stopping coolant leakage from primary circuit to secondary circuit due to absence of pressure differential between primary and secondary loop. After the initiation of tube rupture, the leak from affected Steam Generator ‘A’ is about 3000 t/h (833.33 kg/s) which is reduced to approximately 500 t/h(138.89kg/s) within 200s of the accident. The result also shows that the reactor power (both ‘Thermal’ and ‘Nuclear Flux’) collapses drastically following reactor trip. Both High Pressure Injection (HPI) pump is activated following “Reactor Scram” to prevent core damage. The average temperature of coolant at the reactor inlet decreases from 580K to 560K to facilitate cooling down of the primary coolant. The data obtained from the simulation are satisfactorily consistent with PSAR (Preliminary Safety Assessment Report) data regarding SGTR accident. These findings are expected to provide useful information in understanding and evaluating plants capability to mitigate the consequence of SGTR accident.