ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
In transition: Commercializing fusion power
Commercial fusion power is closer than ever. There are now around 30 U.S. fusion companies, several of which claim to be on track to connect to the grid as early as the 2030s.
Tokamak and laser inertial confinement approaches benefit from decades of research at facilities such as the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and ITER, with alternative concepts including stellarator, magnetic mirror, and Z-pinch confinement also making notable progress as private and government funding for fusion increases.
Jiaqi Chen, Caleb S. Brooks
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 5 | May 2023 | Pages 886-906
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2103347
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The axial-flow centrifugal bubble separator designed for the gaseous fission product removal system in liquid-fueled molten salt reactors is simulated using the Eulerian two-fluid model coupled with the Adaptive Multiple Size Group method to account for the significant coalescence and breakup in the bubble separator. The behavior of the gas core in the bubble separator is mimicked by the symmetric interfacial area concentration model. The separator efficiency, local velocity, and pressure profiles at various conditions are compared with experimental data. Good agreement is found between the experiment and the simulation for the separator efficiency. With the coalescence and breakup being accounted for, the effect of the inlet void fraction on the separator efficiency is correctly captured. For the local pressure and velocity profiles, the agreement is only quantitative due to the simplifications on the geometry and potential limitations of the current computational fluid dynamics models. As good agreement is found for the separator efficiency, the sensitivity study is performed for various operational and design parameters with further simplified two-dimensional axisymmetric simulation.