ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Uranium prices reach highest level since February 2024
The end-of-January spot price for uranium was $94.28 per pound, according to uranium fuel provider Cameco. That was the highest spot price posted by the company since the $95.00 per pound it listed at the end of February 2024. Spot prices during 2025 ranged from a low of $64.23 per pound at the end of March to a high of $82.63 per pound at the end of September.
Hwanyeal Yu, Seongdong Jang, Yonghee Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 7 | July 2021 | Pages 766-777
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1867435
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Based on embedded analysis, an accurate pin power reconstruction (PPR) method is proposed for conventional nodal analysis. Unlike the common form function (FF) method, the new PPR method, named the embedded pin power reconstruction (EPPR) method, directly solves a two-group fixed-source problem that is defined with pinwise homogenized group constants (HGCs) and coarse-mesh incoming partial currents on the boundary. In the EPPR scheme, the pinwise HGCs including the pinwise discontinuity factor are predetermined from single-assembly lattice calculations, and the boundary partial currents are obtained from two-step nodal analyses. Two EPPR approaches are proposed: One is a 3×3 extended color-set configuration, and the other is a smaller one considering the half-thickness of the surrounding fuel assemblies. The performance of the EPPR methods is evaluated with various benchmark problems including partially mixed oxide–loaded pressurized water reactor cores, and the results are compared with the conventional FF method. Comprehensive results of this work demonstrate that the new EPPR method can provide much better accuracy than the conventional FF-based PPR method.