ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Going Nuclear: Notes from the officially unofficial book tour
I work in the analytical labs at one of Europe’s oldest and largest nuclear sites: Sellafield, in northwestern England. I spend my days at the fume hood front, pipette in one hand and radiation probe in the other (and dosimeter pinned to my chest, of course). Outside the lab, I have a second job: I moonlight as a writer and public speaker. My new popular science book—Going Nuclear: How the Atom Will Save the World—came out last summer, and it feels like my life has been running at full power ever since.
D. B. MacMillan, M. L. Storm
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 16 | Number 4 | August 1963 | Pages 369-380
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A26547
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The applicability of the zero-neutron-lifetime approximation in describing the effects of neutron-level fluctuations is investigated for reactivities near and above prompt critical. It is concluded that meaningful statistical information can be obtained by the zero-lifetime model above prompt critical, and an approximate procedure for joining this model to a deterministic finite-lifetime model is suggested. Illustrative examples, comparing numerical results obtained by this approximation with more accurate finite-lifetime statistical calculations, are presented. In addition, application is made to Los Alamos and Livermore superprompt-critical burst experiments which fall outside of the practical computing range of the finite-lifetime model described in Part II. It is found that the agreement of calculation and experiment is as good as was found previously for a set of subprompt-critical burst experiments.