ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Louis J. Barbieri, J. Wallace Webster, Ken Tang Chow
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 2 | February 1959 | Pages 105-119
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25563
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The economics and physics of plutonium recycle in the Calder Hall type reactor are considered. Three possible schemes of recycle are studied. In scheme A the plutonium produced in a run is blended with fresh natural uranium for a subsequent run; in scheme B the plutonium is alloyed with some diluent metal and fabricated into high heat-transfer elements more like MTR- or PWR-seed type elements and a subsequent load of fresh natural uranium elements is “spiked” with these plutonium elements; and in scheme C half the spent uranium is recycled as well as the plutonium. The conclusions are that scheme A will be the most economic means of recycle and will compete very favorably with the mode of operation where the plutonium is sold at the end of each run for $12 per gm. Viewed in another way, with natural uranium having its current value and lease charge, the fuel value of plutonium for recycling, with all costs considered, will be greater than $12 per gm. Schemes B and C do not look as attractive as A for the Calder Hall type reactor. The results are predicated on the assumption that the fuel elements will withstand exposure levels as high as 8800 Mwd/ton. This is beyond present experience, but it is believed that it is not unrealistic to assume that such exposures will be achieved in the future with improved fuel elements. A matrix-analytic solution to the differential equations governing isotopic concentrations as functions of flux-time is also developed.