ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
Fixing the barriers: How new policies can make U.S. nuclear exports competitive again
The United States has a strong marketplace of ideas on future civil nuclear technology. President Trump wants to see 10 large reactors under construction by 2030 and has discussed making $80 billion available for that objective. Evolutionary small modular reactors based on light water reactor technology are on the market now, and the Tennessee Valley Authority expects a construction permit for a project at its Clinch River Site later this year.
Louis J. Barbieri, J. Wallace Webster, Ken Tang Chow
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 2 | February 1959 | Pages 105-119
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25563
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The economics and physics of plutonium recycle in the Calder Hall type reactor are considered. Three possible schemes of recycle are studied. In scheme A the plutonium produced in a run is blended with fresh natural uranium for a subsequent run; in scheme B the plutonium is alloyed with some diluent metal and fabricated into high heat-transfer elements more like MTR- or PWR-seed type elements and a subsequent load of fresh natural uranium elements is “spiked” with these plutonium elements; and in scheme C half the spent uranium is recycled as well as the plutonium. The conclusions are that scheme A will be the most economic means of recycle and will compete very favorably with the mode of operation where the plutonium is sold at the end of each run for $12 per gm. Viewed in another way, with natural uranium having its current value and lease charge, the fuel value of plutonium for recycling, with all costs considered, will be greater than $12 per gm. Schemes B and C do not look as attractive as A for the Calder Hall type reactor. The results are predicated on the assumption that the fuel elements will withstand exposure levels as high as 8800 Mwd/ton. This is beyond present experience, but it is believed that it is not unrealistic to assume that such exposures will be achieved in the future with improved fuel elements. A matrix-analytic solution to the differential equations governing isotopic concentrations as functions of flux-time is also developed.