ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Jack Chernick, Russel Vernon
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 4 | Number 5 | November 1958 | Pages 649-672
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE58-A25554
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two basic formulas for resonance absorption applicable both to mixtures and to lumps are considered, the narrow resonance (NR) approximation and the infinite mass (NRIA) approximation. The formulas are shown to be complementary, yielding accurate results when the choice between them is based on the practical width of the resonance line as originally suggested by Wigner. The formulas are used to calculate resonance integrals for U238 and Th232. The results yield a low mass absorption term and a surface absorption term proportional to the square root of the surface-to-mass ratio for lumps of practical size in qualitative agreement with the experimental work of Egiazarov and Hellstrand for U238 and with Dayton and Pettus for thorium. Dresner’s suggestion that the ratio of the resonance integral to the mass absorption term is independent of the resonance structure is not borne out. Refinement of the basic formulas is discussed. The correction of the NRIA formula for energy degradation is in agreement with Spinney’s calculations for U-H mixtures and with Monte Carlo results obtained by Auerbach for uranium-water lattices. Consideration of lumping effects indicates that the basic formulas generally underestimate the resonance absorption. It is therefore recommended that the common use of ill-defined flux disadvantage factors be dropped.