ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
C. D. Watson, G. A. West, W. F. Schaffer, JR.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 17 | Number 1 | September 1963 | Pages 149-164
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A17220
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experimental mechanical equipment for removing the stainless steel jackets from the liquid-metal-bonded fuels of the Sodium Reactor Experiment (SRE), Fermi, and Hallam reactors was evaluated on a pilot scale. A hydraulic dejacketing method and two alternative methods were tested with spent, NaK-bonded stainless-steel-jacketed fuel from Core 1 of the SRE. This four-year-old fuel, consisting of 2.7% enriched uranium slugs, was exposed to an average irradiation of 675 Mw-day/tonne during a period of two years. It was discharged from the reactor after abnormal temperatures had damaged 30% of the core. About 1.8 metric tonnes of spent Core 1 fuel were dejacketed mechanically at rates up to 9.2 kg of uranium per hour. A production rate 2 to 3 times higher had been predicted from the processing of unirradiated fuel. The hydraulic method, by which it was planned that all fuel would be processed (by expansion of the jackets and expulsion of the slugs) worked with only 16.5% of the fuel. The remainder of the fuel had to be processed by one of the two alternative methods. Dislodgment of fuel slugs from the jackets was extremely difficult because the jacket and some slugs were stuck together by a eutectic alloy of stainless steel-uranium. Also, the irradiated jackets had lost their ductility from the midpoint of a fuel rod to the top and, in addition, showed evidence of carburization, work hardening, sensitization, and embrittlement. Dejacketing of the abnormal SRE Core 1 fuel was accomplished successfully but none of the three dejacketing methods evaluated appeared to be sufficiently versatile to accommodate abnormal fuel and thus cannot be guaranteed as reliable production methods for the liquid-metal-bonded fuels.