ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
DOE, General Matter team up for new fuel mission at Hanford
The Department of Energy's Office of Environmental Management (EM) on Tuesday announced a partnership with California-based nuclear fuel company General Matter for the potential use of the long-idle Fuels and Materials Examination Facility (FMEF) at the Hanford Site in Washington state.
According to the announcement, the DOE and General Matter have signed a lease to explore the FMEF's potential to be used for advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies and materials, in part to help satisfy the predicted future requirements of artificial intelligence.
Theodore H. Smith, Burr H. Randolph
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 4 | Number 6 | December 1958 | Pages 762-784
doi.org/10.13182/NSE58-A15497
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Many factors influence the design of a containment structure: size and shape of the reactor and other equipment to be housed, topographic and subsurface features of the site, proximity to populated areas, relative economy of construction materials, need for access during operation, and most important, pressure-volume duty. For a given duty, and for geometrically similar structures, the volume can often be varied over a broad range with little change in total cost. The upper limiting volume is reached when external forces rather than internal govern the design; the lower limit is usually the point where the membrane becomes unreasonably thick. Two or more small vessels connected together may have advantages over one large vessel, but additional design problems arise in making them act as a unit. The merits of total versus partial containment are discussed. A comparison is made of the various designs studied in selecting the containment vessel for the Dresden Nuclear Power Station. These included simple and composite structures, some above and some below ground, some designed for total and some for partial containment. A steel sphere for partial containment was selected as best suiting the needs of this project.