ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Jonathan Coburn, Robert Kolasinski, Dinh Truong, Dmitry Rudakov, Huiqian Wang, Jun Ren, Charlie Lasnier, Claudio Marini, Joshua Sugar, Richard Nygren, Antonio Cruz, Tyler Abrams, Jonathan Watkins
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 81 | Number 7 | October 2025 | Pages 642-660
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2025.2493406
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
ITER-grade tungsten and dispersoid-strengthened tungsten samples with the top surface angled at ~15 deg toward the incident plasma flux were exposed to nine H-mode discharges with edge-localized modes (ELMs) in the lower divertor of the DIII-D tokamak using the Divertor Materials Evaluation System (DiMES). Surface damage included cracking and flaking of material on the two samples farthest away from the plasma strike point (SP) and significant melting of the two samples closest to the SP. Heat flux and thermal analysis tools new to DIII-D have been applied to better understand this material response and to help optimize the exposure conditions for future experiments. SMITER field-line tracing simulations based on IRTV data and EFIT equilibria estimate an average inter-ELM perpendicular heat flux on the angled surfaces of 10.1 to 19.6 MW/m2 for a majority of the nine discharges, increasing to 15.6 to 24.5 MW/m2 for the single, higher-power shot where samples melted. Fast camera data showed shallow intra-ELM melting and resolidification, which transitioned to bulk inter-ELM melting with melt motion in the direction. About 50% of the protruding volume of the most affected sample was displaced via melt motion. SIERRA thermal modeling software was able to reproduce an onset time of melting consistent with fast camera data and final sample conditions, within <200 ms. Maximum surface temperatures of 3122 and 2787 K are estimated for the samples farthest away from the SP, while the closest samples achieve melting at 4067 and 4750 ms into the ~5000-ms plasma exposure. A +10% increase in both the SMITER calculations and the estimated ELM heat loads was required to achieve this result, which is within the uncertainty of the diagnostic data but likely accounts for non-ideal geometry effects plus other physics uncertainties not included in this first iteration of modeling. This work provided valuable estimates of the three-dimensional temperature evolution to help better understand the observed surface morphology and internal recrystallization of samples, which are discussed in detail in a complementary paper (R. D. Kolasinski et al. “Recrystallization, Melting, and Erosion of Dispersoid-Strengthened Tungsten Materials During Exposure to Divertor Plasmas”). Benchmarking efforts with more diagnosed DIII-D experiments are underway to further refine the SMITER and SIERRA models for DiMES. Future use of these tools will enable researchers to precisely target heat flux exposure conditions in DIII-D to test—but not exceed—the thermomechanical limitations of novel plasma-facing materials.