ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
A. Redl, M. Faitsch, T. Looby, T. Eich, ASDEX Upgrade Team
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 81 | Number 7 | October 2025 | Pages 623-641
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2025.2478720
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two physics modules, the optical heat flux approximation and the photon volume emission, of the Heat flux Engineering Analysis Toolkit (HEAT) have been experimentally validated on ASDEX Upgrade. For validation of both modules, two dedicated tiles are selected: One is taken from the outer divertor target, where it is intersected by the strike line, and one is taken from the private flux region, which is an area only exposed to radiation. Three pulses [L-mode, Type-I ELMy H-mode, and quasi-continuous-exhaust (QCE) H-mode] have been chosen for this validation task. Infrared-based heat flux profiles and thermocouple-based temperature profiles have been compared against the HEAT simulations. Any input required for HEAT is deduced from dedicated experimental results. Whereas for the L-mode case, perfect matches between the experimental data and HEAT results can be achieved easily, for the H-mode case, the situation requires a deeper look into the underlying physics to obtain good agreement. In the case of the Type-I ELMy H-mode, this is related to the non-consideration of edge-localized modes in these HEAT simulations. For the QCE H-mode case, this result seems to be connected to a broadening of the power fall-off length because of the presence of enhanced radially directed filamentary transport. In both of these situations, HEAT can be used to identify a discrepancy between the experimental data and the physics models, to quantify the magnitude of this discrepancy, and to provide insight into the energy sharing between various transport channels.