ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
ANS hosts webinar on criticality safety standards
A diagram depicting the NRC’s regulatory structure for nuclear criticality safety. (Image: Oak Ridge National Laboratory)
The American Nuclear Society’s Risk-informed, Performance-based Principles and Policy Committee (RP3C) held another presentation in its monthly Community of Practice (CoP) series last month. RP3C chair Steven Krahn opened the meeting with brief introductory remarks about the importance of risk-informed, performance based (RIPB) decision-making and the need for new approaches to nuclear design that go beyond conventional and deterministic methods.
Kuhika Gupta, Hank Jenkins-Smith, Joseph Ripberger, Carol Silva, Andrew Fox, Will Livingston
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 81 | Number 1 | January 2025 | Pages 1-17
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2024.2328457
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Efforts to capitalize on recent advances in fusion energy hold promise for sustainable clean energy. Realization of this promise will require addressing both technical and social challenges. In this paper we focus on the latter, using survey data from a representative sample of the U.S. public to evaluate prospects for sustainable public support for fusion. We demonstrate that while fusion is broadly viewed in a generally positive light across age, gender, and partisan groups, most people concede that they have little knowledge about the technology. The array of images and emotions currently associated with fusion energy technologies tends to be positive, particularly in comparison with those evoked by traditional fission nuclear energy. Trust for regulators and operators of prospective fusion energy facilities is currently quite high and is strongly associated with support for fusion energy. Positive views of fusion also get a boost from technological optimism, but the persistent connection among some Americans to fears of nuclear technologies tends to reduce that support. Implications are that while fusion currently enjoys broad public support, developers and regulators need to exercise care to assure that accidents, overly optimistic claims, and poorly designed and executed regulations do not inflame perceived risks and distrust. As with nuclear fission, continuing investments in a regulatory process for fusion that is grounded in trust, robust technological designs, and a culture of responsible safety will be needed to sustain public support.