ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
IAEA again raises global nuclear power projections
Noting recent momentum behind nuclear power, the International Atomic Energy Agency has revised up its projections for the expansion of nuclear power, estimating that global nuclear operational capacity will more than double by 2050—reaching 2.6 times the 2024 level—with small modular reactors expected to play a pivotal role in this high-case scenario.
IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi announced the new projections, contained in the annual report Energy, Electricity, and Nuclear Power Estimates for the Period up to 2050 at the 69th IAEA General Conference in Vienna.
In the report’s high-case scenario, nuclear electrical generating capacity is projected to increase to from 377 GW at the end of 2024 to 992 GW by 2050. In a low-case scenario, capacity rises 50 percent, compared with 2024, to 561 GW. SMRs are projected to account for 24 percent of the new capacity added in the high case and for 5 percent in the low case.
M. Roedig, V. Barabash, R. Eaton, T. Hirai, I. Kupriyanov, J. Linke, X. Liu, A. Schmidt, Zh. Wang
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 62 | Number 1 | July-August 2012 | Pages 16-20
PFC and FW Materials Issues | Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Fusion Reactor Materials, Part A: Fusion Technology | doi.org/10.13182/FST12-A14105
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In order to qualify new beryllium grades for ITER, several Russian and Chinese materials were tested in the electron beam facility JUDITH-1 and compared to the reference material S65C. In a former campaign, samples from these materials were loaded in thermal shock experiments with single shots and multiple shots. The present work is an extension of this work to other loading scenarios.Four actively cooled mock-ups were produced in Russia and in China (two by each party). These mock-ups consisted of a water-cooled CuCrZr body with four tiles from different beryllium grades. Both parties used their own joining techniques, but each of the mock-ups also contained beryllium tiles from the other party, as well as from S65C.Each tile was loaded by the following scenarios on different surface areas:• simulation of vertical displacement events (VDEs) at 40 MJ/m2, 1 shot, heated area a = 10 × 10 mm2, 50-ms ramp-up, 165-ms steady state• disruption simulation at 3 MJ/m2, 1 shot, heated area a = 5 × 5 mm2, t = 5 ms• repetitive test with 1000 shots at 80 MW/m2 (2 MJ/m2), a = 10 × 10 mm2, t = 25 ms. This loading condition is similar to one that was proposed by Sandia National Laboratory for the comparison of different beryllium grades.Finally, one mock-up by each party underwent a thermal fatigue test with 1000 cycles at 2 MW/m2, 15 s heating, and 15 s cooling (heated area: whole sample surface). Heavy melting was observed in the area of the VDE loading, but no detachment of any of the tiles was found. Following the high-heat-flux experiments in the electron beam facility, post-mortem examinations were performed by optical photography and scanning electron microscopy on the surfaces as well as by metallography. From these analyses, no fundamental differences were found for the damage in the different beryllium grades.