ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Become a knowledge manager at UWC 2024
The American Nuclear Society is now accepting applications for knowledge managers to work during the 2024 Utility Working Conference and Vendor Technology Expo. This year’s UWC, “Nuclear Momentum: Advancing Our Clean Energy Future,” will be held August 4–7, 2024, at the JW Marriott Marco Island Beach Resort on Marco Island, Fla.=
Min Lee, Chen Tsung Fan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 99 | Number 1 | July 1992 | Pages 43-57
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34702
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Responses of a large, dry pressurized water reactor (PWR) containment in a station blackout sequence are analyzed with the CONTAIN, MARCH3, and MAAP codes. Results show that the predicted containment responses in a station blackout sequence of these three codes are substantially different. Among these predictions, the MAAP code predicts the highest containment pressure because of the large amount of water made available to quench the debris upon vessel failure. The gradual water boiloff by debris pressurizes the containment. The combustible gas burning models in these codes are briefly described and compared. In a station blackout sequence of a large, dry PWR containment, the discrete burning of combustible gases does not occur in the MAAP calculation because of the predicted high steam concentration. A comparison of the one-cell MARCH3 calculation and the six-cell CONTAIN calculation shows that the burning of combustible gases occurs earlier and has a larger impact on containment pressure in the MARCH3 calculation. For the cases analyzed, the simplified MARCH3 calculations always predict a higher containment pressure than the complicated CONTAIN calculations. The results of the CONTAIN calculation show that combustible gas detonation may occur in a local region of a large, dry PWR containment during a station blackout sequence.