ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE issues new NEPA rule and procedures—and accelerates DOME reactor testing
Meeting a deadline set in President Trump’s May 23 executive order “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” the DOE on June 30 updated information on its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rulemaking and implementation procedures and published on its website an interim final rule that rescinds existing regulations alongside new implementing procedures.
Selim Sancaktar, David R. Sharp
Nuclear Technology | Volume 84 | Number 3 | March 1989 | Pages 315-318
Technical Paper | Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34215
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) techniques and the lessons learned from previous PRA studies were used to evaluate the effectiveness of various design alternatives for the Westinghouse advanced pressurized water reactor design. This evaluation was done successfully at the design stage prior to the licensing stage and is probably the first example of such an application for a nuclear power plant design. Three measures of risk were utilized: plant core melt frequency per year, severe fission product release frequency per year, and economic risk to the plant owner in terms of present-day dollars. All plant configurations considered met or exceeded the safety criteria associated with regulatory requirements. The comparison of different alternatives was performed iteratively; after each iteration, the system most effective in reducing the total plant core melt frequency was chosen and added to the base plant configuration. The iterations were terminated when a predetermined cutoff level was reached. Probabilistic risk assessment techniques provide a viable method to create additional decision-making information at the plant design stage.