ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Young Members Group
The Young Members Group works to encourage and enable all young professional members to be actively involved in the efforts and endeavors of the Society at all levels (Professional Divisions, ANS Governance, Local Sections, etc.) as they transition from the role of a student to the role of a professional. It sponsors non-technical workshops and meetings that provide professional development and networking opportunities for young professionals, collaborates with other Divisions and Groups in developing technical and non-technical content for topical and national meetings, encourages its members to participate in the activities of the Groups and Divisions that are closely related to their professional interests as well as in their local sections, introduces young members to the rules and governance structure of the Society, and nominates young professionals for awards and leadership opportunities available to members.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
May 2024
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Commercial nuclear innovation "new space" age
In early 2006, a start-up company launched a small rocket from a tiny island in the Pacific. It exploded, showering the island with debris. A year later, a second launch attempt sent a rocket to space but failed to make orbit, burning up in the atmosphere. Another year brought a third attempt—and a third failure. The following month, in September 2008, the company used the last of its funds to launch a fourth rocket. It reached orbit, making history as the first privately funded liquid-fueled rocket to do so.
E. F. Mitenkova, N. V. Novikov, A. I. Blokhin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 183 | Number 3 | September 2013 | Pages 446-454
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT13-A19432
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Different uranium-plutonium fuel compositions are considered for sodium fast reactors of the next generation. Considerable discrepancies in axial and radial neutron spectra for hybrid reactor systems compared to uranium oxide fuel cores increase uncertainties in the key calculated neutronic characteristics of hybrid systems. The calculation results of a BFS-62-3A critical assembly considered as a full-scale model of BN-600 hybrid core with steel reflector specify quite different spectra in local areas. In such systems the MCNP5 calculations demonstrate a noticeable sensitivity of the key neutronic characteristics (effective multiplication factor keff, spectral indices) to nuclear data libraries and extra steel such as dowels placed in the core. Uncertainties in the location of stainless steel dowels and in their quantity cause uncertainties in the fuel-to-steel mass ratio in the core. For 235U, 238U, and 239Pu, the calculated radial fission rate distributions against the reconstructed ones are analyzed. A comparative analysis of spectral indices, neutron spectra, and radial fission rate distributions is performed using nuclear data libraries generated from ENDF/B-VII.0, JEFF-3.1.1, JENDL-3.3, and BROND-3 for Fe and Cr isotopes. When performing analysis of the fission-rate sensitivity to the presence of plutonium in fuel, 239Pu is replaced by 235U in local areas containing plutonium. For radial fission rate distributions, peak discrepancies may be due to possible underestimation of some features of experimental data processing and reconstruction methods (Westcott factors, temperature dependence, local core features). A more-sophisticated impact analysis of spatially different neutron spectra on neutron characteristics of the core is also required. To confirm the results of BFS-62-3A analysis, radial fission-rate distributions are calculated for BFS-62-4 with UO2 blanket instead of steel reflector.