ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
60 Years of U: Perspectives on resources, demand, and the evolving role of nuclear energy
Recent years have seen growing global interest in nuclear energy and rising confidence in the sector. For the first time since the early 2000s, there is renewed optimism about the industry’s future. This change is driven by several major factors: geopolitical developments that highlight the need for secure energy supplies, a stronger focus on resilient energy systems, national commitments to decarbonization, and rising demand for clean and reliable electricity.
Min Woo Seo, Jae Woo Park
Nuclear Technology | Volume 168 | Number 3 | December 2009 | Pages 938-942
Miscellaneous | Special Issue on the 11th International Conference on Radiation Shielding and the 15th Topical Meeting of the Radiation Protection and Shielding Division (PART 3) / Radiation Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT09-A9330
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A fiber-optic dosimeter model is constructed with a small piece of Gd2SiO5 (GSO) scintillator optically attached to a low attenuating plastic optical fiber. The lights generated in the scintillator are transmitted through the fiber and read by a current-type photomultiplier tube (PMT). The dosimeter model was tested with two 60Co standard sources of 1.85 and 37 MBq by measuring the PMT current as a function of the source-to-detector distance. It was then tested in a 60Co irradiation chamber with an activity of [approximately]244.2 TBq. MCNPX simulations were performed for the source and dosimeter arrangements to calculate the deposited energy in the GSO scintillator. When tested with standard 60Co sources of 1.85 and 37 MBq, the dosimeter model did not produce satisfactory results. However, better results were obtained with the higher-activity source. In the test in a 60Co irradiation chamber of 244.2 TBq, the measured data well coincide with the MCNPX simulation results. In a direct comparison with a Farmer-type ion chamber, it is found the dosimeter readings can be simply converted to the air kerma doses by proper calibration.