ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
World Bank, IAEA partner to fund nuclear energy
The World Bank and the International Atomic Energy Agency signed an agreement last week to cooperate on the construction and financing of advanced nuclear projects in developing countries, marking the first partnership since the bank ended its ban on funding for nuclear energy projects.
M. Brugger, D. Forkel-Wirth, S. Roesler
Nuclear Technology | Volume 168 | Number 3 | December 2009 | Pages 665-669
Accelerators | Special Issue on the 11th International Conference on Radiation Shielding and the 15th Topical Meeting of the Radiation Protection and Shielding Division (PART 3) / Radiation Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT09-A9286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The FLUKA code is used to simulate the residual dose rates around a typical beam absorber considering various scenarios. The latter include carbon, copper, and tungsten as jaw materials, different beam energies, protons, and lead ion beams as well as different irradiation and cooling times. Using the dose rate maximum close to the absorber surface, the study investigates the cooling time dependence for the different scenarios. It is found to be similar for all jaw materials and beam energies. The dose rate scales with energy as E0.83 and with the number of nucleons when comparing proton beam with lead ions. After a sufficiently long cooling time, a few radionuclides produced in the steel tank, such as 56Co, 58Co, 48V, and 54Mn, dominate the dose rate. The study can be easily extended to other materials or irradiation scenarios and can be applied to first evaluations of given accelerator design options.