ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
College students help develop waste-measuring device at Hanford
A partnership between Washington River Protection Solutions (WRPS) and Washington State University has resulted in the development of a device to measure radioactive and chemical tank waste at the Hanford Site. WRPS is the contractor at Hanford for the Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management.
Robert E. Spears, Efe G. Kurt, Justin L. Coleman
Nuclear Technology | Volume 205 | Number 4 | April 2019 | Pages 624-636
Technical Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2018.1507393
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Seismic soil-structure interaction (SSI) analysis of nuclear facilities is an important consideration during design and retrofit. SSI tools used in the nuclear industry are currently based on an equivalent linear (EL) approach. Procedures for developing input ground motion for EL approaches are well established. However, the procedures for establishing input ground motion for nonlinear soil-structure interaction (NLSSI) analysis of nuclear facilities are not well established. A collaborative research group at Idaho National Laboratory has recently developed analytical methods and numerical tools for using NLSSI analysis for nuclear facility seismic calculations. NLSSI analysis for a nuclear facility allows for calculation of seismic wave motion through a near-field soil domain using either (a) vertically propagating shear and compressive waves, which is the current industry practice, or (b) a three-dimensional nonvertical wave field. This technical note presents an iterative procedure for establishing outcrop motion at a depth in the soil column for NLSSI analysis that uses vertically propagating shear waves.
The approach presented in this technical note starts with a known ground motion at the surface that is deconvolved to a depth, and then the obtained motion is convolved up to a different desired location of input for the NLSSI model. To demonstrate the validity of the approach, a finite element soil column that is representative of a nuclear facility site in the United States is used to produce compatible outcrop seismic time series for reduced nonlinear soil mesh depths. The developed approach for reducing the nonlinear soil column model depth is a two-step iterative method. The first step is establishing an outcrop time series at the lowest depth considered that produces the top-of-soil response spectrum of an actual recorded ground motion. The second step is providing compatible outcrop time series at a shallower depth based on the information from the first step.
A comparison of the 5% damped response spectrum from the resulting acceleration time series based on the iterated outcrop motions and the original acceleration time series is conducted. The study shows that the proposed iterative approach produced comparable results within 1% range of the original recorded time series results when sufficient iterations were performed.