ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC session focuses on interagency collaboration
Attendees at last week’s 2026 Regulatory Information Conference, hosted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, saw extensive discussion of new reactor technologies, uprates, fusion, multiunit deployments, supply chain, and much more.
With the industry in a state of rapid evolution, there was much to discuss. Connected to all these topics was one central theme: the ongoing changes at the NRC. With massively shortened timelines, the ADVANCE Act and Executive Order 14300, and new interagency collaboration and authorization pathways in mind, speakers spent much of the RIC exploring what the road ahead looks like for the NRC.
Noritoshi Minami, Toshiaki Chikusa, Michio Murase
Nuclear Technology | Volume 164 | Number 2 | November 2008 | Pages 265-277
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A4025
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Different flow patterns of steam forward flow and nitrogen reverse flow in U-tubes were observed in the reflux condensation experiments using the Bethsy facility with 34 U-tubes. In this study, the behavior was calculated using RELAP5/MOD3.2 with two and three flow channels of U-tubes. By the modification of the weighting factor for the calculation of friction coefficients, the nitrogen reverse flow was successfully calculated. In the calculations changing the flow area ratio of two flow channels, the number of active U-tubes with steam forward flow was predicted using the assumption that flow was most stable in the case with the maximum nitrogen recirculation flow rate, and it agreed rather well with the observed number of active U-tubes (19 to 24 U-tubes) within the difference of 4 U-tubes. In the calculations with three flow channels, without the assumption, the average of the ratios of active U-tubes in several calculations (four cases in this study) with different flow area ratios of the three flow channels gave good prediction of the ratio of active U-tubes. The results indicate the validity of the assumption that the flow with the maximum nitrogen recirculation flow rate may be the most stable and appear most probably among different numbers of active U-tubes.