ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deployable Energy achieves criticality at INL
Ahead of the July 4 deadline set by President Trump in Executive Order 14301, the nuclear community has been following the developments of the Department of Energy’s Reactor Pilot Program, in which companies have been pursuing DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. The EO set an ambitious goal of three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
Yoon Sub Sim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 161 | Number 3 | March 2008 | Pages 299-314
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A3928
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Decay heat removal in a nuclear plant is very important, and the performance of a decay heat removal system in a plant is a critical factor for the plant safety. In designing the decay heat removal system, a passive-type system is usually more difficult than an active-type system, and there can be additional restrictions in designing plant systems for passive decay heat removal to secure a sufficient natural-circulation head. If one can devise a decay heat exchanger that can enhance buildup of the natural-circulation head during an accident, the restrictions on designing the systems related to the decay heat removal can be relaxed and a better plant design can be attained. To meet this necessity, a design concept of an improved decay heat removal heat exchanger, IDINHX, was devised for a pool-type liquid-metal reactor (LMR). Its performance was evaluated, and the physics related to the core cooling in a pool-type LMR was investigated. During an accident, the core exit temperature usually peaks twice. The first peaking reflects the early-phase cooling capacity of a system, and the second peaking reflects the late-phase or long-term cooling capacity. The physics of the first peaking are more complex than that of the second peaking and, consequently, designing against the first peaking is more difficult. Based on the investigation results, ways to control the first peaking are suggested.