ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
UIUC submits MMR construction permit application
The University of Illinois–Urbana-Champaign, in partnership with Nano Nuclear Energy, has submitted a construction permit application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for construction of a Kronos micro modular reactor (MMR). This is the first major step in the two-part 10 CFR Part 50 licensing process for the research and test reactor and is the culmination of years of technical refinement and regulatory alignment.
The team chose to engage with the NRC in a preapplication readiness assessment, providing the agency with draft versions of the majority of the CPA’s technical content for feedback, which is expected to ensure a high-quality application.
Tsuyoshi Okawa, Ehud Greenspan
Nuclear Technology | Volume 160 | Number 3 | December 2007 | Pages 257-278
Technical Paper | Fission Reactors | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3898
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Encapsulated Nuclear Heat Source (ENHS) is a small lead-bismuth-cooled Generation IV reactor designed to have a once-for-life core with a nearly zero burnup reactivity swing and heat removal by natural circulation. All the ENHS cores designed so far have positive coolant void reactivity. This work searches for ENHS core designs having negative coolant void reactivity feedback and quantifies the penalty associated with a design for negative void reactivity. The approaches tried for turning the positive void coefficient negative are as follows: (a) enhancing the neutron leakage probability by reducing the fuel length, introducing neutron absorbers at the core boundary, using a gas-lift pump to introduce gas bubbles throughout the coolant in the core and fission gas plenum regions, and incorporating neutron-streaming channels in and adjacent to the core; (b) introducing into the core materials, such as Ca3N2, having enhanced absorption cross section at high energy; and (c) introducing into the core materials, such as CaH2, that will keep the neutron spectrum softer in the case of coolant voiding.The preferred negative void reactivity core design consists of 100-cm-long fuel rods, a 20-cm-thick B4C layer below the core, and a voided channel around the core radial boundary. The reactivity effect is negative when the coolant is voided from the entire core and even from only the central region of the core. In order to maintain a nearly zero burnup reactivity swing over at least 20 effective full-power years (EFPY), the core pitch-to-diameter ratio (P/D) has to be reduced from the reference value of 1.36 to 1.20. Correspondingly, for a given ENHS module dimensions the power level that can be removed by natural circulation from this core is ~75% of the reference core. Allowing a burnup reactivity swing of ~0.1% over 20 EFPY enables attaining a negative void reactivity core having P/D of 1.27 that can deliver ~93% of the P/D = 1.36 core power.