ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Who’s in the running for DOE Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses?
Today is the Department of Energy’s deadline for states to respond to a request for information on proposed Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses. Issued on January 28, the RFI marks the first step toward potentially establishing voluntary federal-state partnerships designed to build a coherent, end-to-end nuclear fuel cycle strategy for the country, including waste management, according to the DOE.
Dirk Lucas, Eckhard Krepper, H.-M. Prasser
Nuclear Technology | Volume 158 | Number 2 | May 2007 | Pages 291-303
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT07-A3843
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A detailed experimental database, obtained for a 195-mm inner diameter, 9-m-long pipe was used for the validation of models applied in computational fluid dynamics codes for the simulation of bubbly flow. Since the bubbles were injected via holes at the pipe wall, very useful information on the bubble migration from the pipe wall toward the pipe's center was obtained by measurements at different distances between gas injection and measuring plane. The bubble migration is determined by the forces acting on the bubbles. The multibubble-size group test solver, introduced earlier but with some new extensions, was used to analyze the data. A comparison of results from a simulation and the experimental findings indicate that the turbulent dispersion force according to the Favre averaged drag model is too strong compared with the drag in the radial direction. No appropriate models for bubble coalescence and breakup, which can be applied for a wide range of gas and liquid volume flow rates, are available as yet. Nevertheless, for selected combinations of volume flow rates, the calculated bubble size distributions and radial gas volume fraction profiles show an acceptable agreement with the experimental data.