ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Panelists discuss U.S. path to criticality in ANS webinar
The American Nuclear Society recently hosted a panel discussion featuring prominent figures from the nuclear sector who discussed the industry’s ongoing push for criticality.
Yasir Arafat, chief technical officer of Aalo Atomics; Jordan Bramble, CEO of Antares Nuclear; and Rita Baranwal, chief nuclear officer of Radiant Industries, participated in the discussion and covered their recent progress in the Department of Energy’s Reactor Pilot Program. Nader Satvat, director of nuclear systems design at Kairos Power, gave an update on the company’s ongoing demonstration projects taking place outside of the landscape of DOE authorization.
Ralph O. Meyer
Nuclear Technology | Volume 155 | Number 3 | September 2006 | Pages 293-311
Technical Paper | Fuel Cycle and Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3763
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In late 1993 and early 1994, tests in France and Japan showed that cladding damage in fuel rods with burnups above 50 GWd/ton occurs at much lower energies than in unirradiated fuel rods when exposed to large power pulses. During the last decade, significant additional test results have become available to permit an interim assessment of potential cladding failure in reactivity-initiated accidents (RIAs) in reactors with fuel burnups above 40 GWd/ton, which is generally regarded as high-burnup fuel. These data are summarized, and systematic biases due to atypical test conditions are identified. The magnitude of biases in the fuel enthalpy for failure are estimated to range from -19 to +27 cal/g for the cases analyzed. With these adjustments, a lower bound of the enthalpies for experimentally observed cladding failure is compared with potential enthalpies in pressurized water reactors and boiling water reactors. Based on available information on control rod worths, it is concluded that current operating reactors in the United States are not likely to experience cladding failure during the worst postulated RIAs.