ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
G7 pledges support for nuclear at Italy meeting
The Group of Seven (G7) recommitted its support for nuclear energy in the countries that opt to use it at a Ministerial Meeting on Climate in Italy last month.
In a statement following the April meeting, the group committed to support multilateral efforts to strengthen the resilience of nuclear supply chains, referencing the goal set by 25 countries during last year’s COP28 climate conference in Dubai to triple global nuclear generating capacity by 2050.
Cihang Lu, Zeyun Wu
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 4 | April 2021 | Pages 437-452
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1822661
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Computational modeling and simulations are widely used for evaluation of the performance and safety features of innovative nuclear reactor designs. Multigroup-based deterministic neutronics codes are often employed in these reactor design calculations because they can provide fast predictions of the neutron flux distribution and other neutronics characteristic parameters. Nevertheless, providing accurate multigroup cross sections for deterministic codes is an onerous job, which makes establishing an exhaustive cross-section library computationally prohibitive. Partly because of these reasons, multigroup neutron cross sections are normally stored only at certainty state points in the data library of these deterministic codes, and linear interpolation methodology is commonly utilized to estimate the cross sections at unknown states. However, the applicability of linear interpolation is limited, and the precision of its results is moderate.
In this paper, we discuss a preliminary feasibility study that we performed on providing more precise multigroup cross sections for deterministic neutronics codes by using the linear regression methodology. Compared to the traditional linear interpolation method, the linear regression approach principally showed improved computational efficiency considering the use of more data in the cross-section library, and constructed hypothesis functions for the responses of interest with a higher order of accuracy. In this study, a case study on Lightbridge Corporation’s metallic fuel element was carried out to demonstrate the feasibility and advantages of linear regression in multigroup cross-section interpretation. A reference cross-section library was established through calculations conducted with the Monte Carlo neutronic code Serpent. Because of the preliminary nature of this feasibility study, only the macroscopic total cross section is considered. Linear interpolation and linear regression were both used to estimate cross sections at unknown states based on the data available in the library. By comparing the performance of both methodologies, we demonstrated that the linear regression methodology achieved wider applicability and better precision in cross-section interpretation. Moreover, the linear regression process was finished within 15 s using a single processor core, which indicated that the additional computational burden brought by the implementation of linear regression methodology in the task was acceptable.