ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Strontium: Supply-and-demand success for the DOE’s Isotope Program
The Department of Energy’s Isotope Program (DOE IP) announced last week that it would end its “active standby” capability for strontium-82 production about two decades after beginning production of the isotope for cardiac diagnostic imaging. The DOE IP is celebrating commercialization of the Sr-82 supply chain as “a success story for both industry and the DOE IP.” Now that the Sr-82 market is commercially viable, the DOE IP and its National Isotope Development Center can “reassign those dedicated radioisotope production capacities to other mission needs”—including Sr-89.
Yasuki Kowata, Nobuo Fukumura
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 127 | Number 1 | September 1997 | Pages 89-103
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE97-A1923
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Plutonium fuel could be utilized in the entire core of a heavy water-moderated, boiling light water-cooled pressure-tube-type reactor (HWR). The coolant void reactivity, however, depends on the various parameters of the lattice. It is especially significant to clarify the effect of plutonium nuclides on the void reactivity.The void reactivities in the infinite HWR lattices have been parametrically analyzed to clarify the effects of changes in the lattice parameters on the void reactivity using the WIMS-D4 code with the JENDL-3.1 nuclear data. At present, it is known that the behavior of the void reactivity can be clarified by separating the components of fuel nuclides, neutron cross sections, energy groups, and regions in the lattice cell from the global reactivity effect, using the important reaction rates.If the fuels are the same in the macroscopic absorption cross section for the 2200 m/s neutron, it has been shown that the void reactivity shifts further to a negative direction in a narrower pitch lattice and in the plutonium-fueled lattice with a higher content of 239Pu rather than in the uranium one. The effect of reducing the void reactivity to the negative by fissile plutonium is caused mainly by the presence of the resonance cross section at ~0.3 eV of 239Pu. The higher the content of 239Pu, the less the recovery of dipped neutron flux within the resonance energy width due to a decrease in the thermal neutron scattering of hydrogen with an increase in coolant void fraction, so that the decreased resonance fission rate for 239Pu contributes to the more negative direction for the void reactivity.On the other hand, resonance at ~0.3 eV for 241Pu does not have an important role for the void reactivity because its resonance cross section is smaller than that of 239Pu.