ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
DOE’s latest fusion energy road map aims to bridge known gaps
The Department of Energy introduced a Fusion Science & Technology (S&T) Roadmap on October 16 as a national “Build–Innovate–Grow” strategy to develop and commercialize fusion energy by the mid-2030s by aligning public investment and private innovation. Hailed by Darío Gil, the DOE’s new undersecretary for science, as bringing “unprecedented coordination across America's fusion enterprise” and advancing President Trump’s January 2025 executive order, on “Unleashing American Energy,” the road map echoes plans issued by the DOE’s Office of Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) in 2023 and 2024, with a new emphasis on the convergence of AI and fusion.
The road map release coincided with other fusion energy events held this week in Washington, D.C., and beyond.
Jeffrey E. Seifried, Ehud Greenspan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 181 | Number 1 | September 2015 | Pages 82-95
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-104
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An expression is derived for attributing the reactivity response due to perturbations to spectral, spatial, and isotopic effects. It is shown to be consistent at a global level with similar expressions derived in previous work but can provide more detailed information on the physics phenomena contributing to the reactivity response of the perturbation. Using this expression, the reactivity effect of local coolant density perturbations [local void coefficient of reactivity (VCR)] is studied for two reduced-moderation boiling water reactor (RBWR) core designs—the thorium-fueled RBWR (RBWR-Th) and the uranium-fueled RBWR (RBWR-AC)—as well as for a standard advanced boiling water reactor (ABWR). The RBWR core designs feature large axial variation in their neutron spectra.
The axial distribution of local VCR along the RBWR-Th seed and along the ABWR core were found to have the same general shape: negative throughout but most negative near the bottom and asymptotically approaching zero toward the top. However, the RBWR-Th VCR is roughly four times more negative. The RBWR-AC local VCR axial distribution varies greatly: it is very close to zero in the seed regions and has a significant positive component in the central blanket.
Three effects were identified as contributing to the VCR due to a local water density change in the lower part of the RBWR-Th seed: local spectrum hardening that tends to increase the local reproduction factor (ηr) of each of the fuel isotopes; a redistribution of the local neutron absorption between the fuel isotopes resulting in a shift of absorptions from higher to lower isotopic reproduction factors and, hence, to a reactivity loss; and an axial flux tilt across the core from axial zones of higher ηr to axial zones of lower ηr, which makes another negative contribution to the reactivity worth of the perturbation.