ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2024
Nuclear Technology
October 2024
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC restores expiration dates for renewed Turkey Point licenses
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced this week that it has restored the expiration dates of the Turkey Point nuclear power plant's units 3 and 4 subsequent license renewals (SLR) to July 19, 2052, and April 10, 2053, respectively.
Jeffrey E. Seifried, Ehud Greenspan
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 181 | Number 1 | September 2015 | Pages 82-95
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-104
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An expression is derived for attributing the reactivity response due to perturbations to spectral, spatial, and isotopic effects. It is shown to be consistent at a global level with similar expressions derived in previous work but can provide more detailed information on the physics phenomena contributing to the reactivity response of the perturbation. Using this expression, the reactivity effect of local coolant density perturbations [local void coefficient of reactivity (VCR)] is studied for two reduced-moderation boiling water reactor (RBWR) core designs—the thorium-fueled RBWR (RBWR-Th) and the uranium-fueled RBWR (RBWR-AC)—as well as for a standard advanced boiling water reactor (ABWR). The RBWR core designs feature large axial variation in their neutron spectra.
The axial distribution of local VCR along the RBWR-Th seed and along the ABWR core were found to have the same general shape: negative throughout but most negative near the bottom and asymptotically approaching zero toward the top. However, the RBWR-Th VCR is roughly four times more negative. The RBWR-AC local VCR axial distribution varies greatly: it is very close to zero in the seed regions and has a significant positive component in the central blanket.
Three effects were identified as contributing to the VCR due to a local water density change in the lower part of the RBWR-Th seed: local spectrum hardening that tends to increase the local reproduction factor (ηr) of each of the fuel isotopes; a redistribution of the local neutron absorption between the fuel isotopes resulting in a shift of absorptions from higher to lower isotopic reproduction factors and, hence, to a reactivity loss; and an axial flux tilt across the core from axial zones of higher ηr to axial zones of lower ηr, which makes another negative contribution to the reactivity worth of the perturbation.