ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Margaret A. Marshall
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 178 | Number 4 | December 2014 | Pages 479-495
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-43
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A series of small, compact critical assembly experiments was completed from 1962 to 1965 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory's Critical Experiments Facility in support of the Medium-Power Reactor Experiments program. Initial experiments, performed in November and December 1962, consisted of a core of unmoderated stainless steel tubes surrounded by a graphite reflector. Later experiments included beryllium-reflected assemblies with the fuel in a 1.506-cm triangular lattice and in seven-tube clusters. Once the critical configurations had been achieved, various measurements of reactivity, relative axial and radial activation rates of 235U, and cadmium ratios were performed. The critical configurations, the cadmium ratio, and activation rate measurements for the beryllium-reflected 1.506-cm-array critical configuration have been evaluated and are described in this paper. It was found that these measurements are acceptable as benchmark experiments and have been included in the International Handbook of Evaluated Reactor Physics Benchmark Experiments and the International Handbook of Evaluated Criticality Safety Benchmark Experiments.