ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
60 Years of U: Perspectives on resources, demand, and the evolving role of nuclear energy
Recent years have seen growing global interest in nuclear energy and rising confidence in the sector. For the first time since the early 2000s, there is renewed optimism about the industry’s future. This change is driven by several major factors: geopolitical developments that highlight the need for secure energy supplies, a stronger focus on resilient energy systems, national commitments to decarbonization, and rising demand for clean and reliable electricity.
Mayank Goswami, Anupam Saxena, Prabhat Munshi
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 176 | Number 2 | February 2014 | Pages 240-253
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-26
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Iterative algorithms for computerized tomography reconstruction employ a variety of grids, interpolation techniques, and solution procedures. A new projection-intersection (PI) grid is presented in this work. It comprises all the intersection points between the projection rays passing through the object. A few advantages include (a) a user-independent discretization process and (b) a reduction in reconstruction error caused by nonparticipating nodes. Computerized tomography reconstruction results by PI are compared with existing conventional grids. The multiplicative algebraic reconstruction technique (MART) and entropy maximization are used as solution techniques. We note that for simulated data, the PI grid gives better results when compared with the square-pixel grid. Two different sets of experimental data (obtained previously for a mercury-nitrogen flow loop and one with a known specimen with a static known profile) are processed with the above-mentioned options. A basic theoretical model (but experimentally correlated) is also used to verify the void reference level. Computerized tomography results for experimental projection data indicate a trend similar to the previous MART results, but a major difference is visible in the void-fraction distributions. This fact is important, as heat transfer coefficients are strongly dependent on the distribution of voids.