ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NWMO to select Canadian repository site this year
Canada’s Nuclear Waste Management Organization, a not-for-profit organization responsible for the long-term management of the country’s intermediate- and high-level radioactive waste, is set to select a site for a deep geologic repository by the end of the year.
Alberto Talamo, Waclaw Gudowski
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 156 | Number 2 | June 2007 | Pages 244-266
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE07-A2700
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the present study we investigate the influence of the fuel axial shuffling and the operational control rod maneuvering on the performances of the one-pass (no reprocessing) deep-burn incineration of light water reactor waste in the gas turbine-modular helium reactor. After an irradiation period, the fuel axial shuffling schedule has to take into account the fuel depletion profile generated by the adjustments of the position of the operational control rods, because the insertion of the rods strongly alters the neutron flux shape. We aimed at implementing a numerical simulation as close as possible to a real scenario and therefore took advantage of the powerful geometrical modeling capability of the MCB code to describe the reactor in a detailed three-dimensional geometry model in which we simulated over 120 different burnable materials, each of them undergoing a different neutron flux intensity. We adjusted the position of the control rods every 90 effective full-power days of irradiation to maintain the core as close as possible to the critical condition; thereafter, we recalculated the neutron flux and cross sections by a new MCNP/MCB run. At the present time, this sophisticated approach can be realized only by a computer cluster of ten 64-bit processors working in parallel mode.The fuel axial shuffling adds from 3 to 5% to the transmutation rates of 239Pu, plutonium, and all actinides, which range from 80 to 86, 50 to 53, and 46 to 48%, respectively; the present results are 5 to 14% less compared to the case of a two-pass (reprocessing) deep burn. The efficiency of transmuting minor actinides has been estimated by comparing the long-term radio-toxicity of the fresh and irradiated americium and curium fuel; this comparison revealed that it is not worthwhile to transmute americium and curium in the current design of the gas turbine-modular helium reactor by a one-pass deep burn.
