ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
L. S. Tong
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 33 | Number 1 | July 1968 | Pages 7-15
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A20912
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Flow boiling crisis can be categorized into at least two types: Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) in the subcooled and low-quality region and dry-out in the high-quality region. To analyze the DNB flux in a rod bundle, the flow conditions should be evaluated by a subchannel analysis and a single-channel DNB correlation can be used for predictions. Rod-bundle DNB data have been presented to verify the above statement. The uncertainties in the measured DNB heat fluxes are listed as: statistical nature of flow turbulences and surface conditions, ±3%; fabrication tolerances of test sections, ±5%; imperfectness of correlation in handling the parameter effects, ±5%; and random and systematic instrumentation errors and various loop system characteristics, ±10%. The probability of a rod bundle reaching DNB for a given DNB ratio predicted by W-3 correlation has been evaluated and demonstrated for its use. The effect of a DNB rod in a rod bundle is considered as not detrimental and not contagious. The above statement is demonstrated and evidenced by a photograph of the bird's-eye view of DNB and two sets of experimental data.