ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Seconds Matter: Rethinking Nuclear Facility Security for the Modern Threat Landscape
In today’s rapidly evolving threat environment, nuclear facilities must prioritize speed and precision in their security responses—because in critical moments, every second counts. An early warning system serves as a vital layer of defense, enabling real-time detection of potential intrusions or anomalies before they escalate into full-blown incidents. By providing immediate alerts and actionable intelligence, these systems empower security personnel to respond decisively, minimizing risk to infrastructure, personnel, and the public. The ability to anticipate and intercept threats at the earliest possible stage not only enhances operational resilience but also reinforces public trust in the safety of nuclear operations. Investing in such proactive technologies is no longer optional—it’s essential for modern nuclear security.
Jeffrey A. Favorite
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 175 | Number 1 | September 2013 | Pages 44-69
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-17
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is often desirable to solve radiation transport problems in one-dimensional spherical geometries even if the actual object being modeled is not spherical. It may be possible to use perturbation theory to account for the difference between the real multidimensional system and the spherical approximation. This idea is tested using uncollided as well as multigroup inhomogeneous transport problems with upscattering. Asymmetric and nonuniform perturbations are made to the shielding (not the source) of spherical geometries, including transformations from a sphere to a cube (the surface transformation function is derived), and Schwinger, Roussopolos, and combined perturbation estimates are applied. For uncollided fluxes, perturbation theory, particularly the Schwinger estimate, worked very well when the response of interest was the flux measured at a symmetric spherical 4 detector external to the geometry, but perturbation theory did not work well when the response of interest was the flux measured at a single external point (unless extra care was taken to account for geometric effects). For neutron-induced gamma-ray line fluxes, the Roussopolos estimate worked well when the response of interest was the flux measured at an external 4 detector or an external point detector.