ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Bipartisan Fusion Energy Act pushes for regulatory clarity
Padilla
Sen. Alex Padilla (D., Calif.) introduced the Fusion Energy Act (S. 4151) last month with a bipartisan group of cosponsors—John Cornyn (R., Texas), Cory Booker (D., N.J.), Todd Young (R., Ind.), and Patty Murray (D., Wash.). The legislation would codify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s regulatory authority over commercial fusion energy systems to streamline the creation of clear federal regulations that will support the development of commercial fusion power plants—and would require a report within one year on a study of risk- and performance-based, design-specific licensing frameworks for “mass-manufactured fusion machines.
“Congress must do everything in its power to ensure continued U.S. leadership in developing commercial fusion energy facilities,” said Padilla as he introduced the bill. “The Fusion Energy Act would provide regulatory certainty for investors as the NRC develops and streamlines frameworks for such facilities.”
Defu Zhang, Gary A. Hallock, Alan J. Wootton, Robert H. Flake, John R. Uglum
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 32 | Number 3 | November 1997 | Pages 431-443
Technical Paper | Plasma Control Issues for Tokamaks | doi.org/10.13182/FST97-A6
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A linear, second-order transformer model using magnetic sensor coils has been developed to describe the position control of a tokamak. This model is used to analyze the behavior of a proportional-derivative controller, which has been implemented on TEXT-Upgrade (TEXT-U). The magnetic sensor coils may be placed internal or external to the conducting vacuum vessel. If placed externally, however, eddy currents induced in the vessel wall introduce an error in the position measurement. It is found that this error signal introduces a positive zero in the system transfer function. The transfer function becomes a non-minimum-phase function, which restricts the response speed, stable area, and utilization of the power supply capability. Although the position control system is stabilized by use of a proportional-derivative controller, the controller cannot affect the positive zero. This analysis has been experimentally verified on TEXT-U. With external sensors, the stable operating area is small, and the sensors exhibit an initial undershoot to a step position change, as expected. The observed stable area is predicted by the model, although the model overestimates the size of the actual stable area.