ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
Can hydrogen be the transportation fuel in an otherwise nuclear economy?
Let’s face it: The global economy should be powered primarily by nuclear power. And it probably will by the end of this century, with a still-significant assist from renewables and hydro. Once nuclear systems are dominant, the costs come down to where gas is now; and when carbon emissions are reduced to a small portion of their present state, it will become obvious that most other sources are only good in niche settings. I mean, why use small modular reactors to load-follow when they can just produce that power instead of buffering it?
W. A. Houlberg
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 44 | Number 2 | September 2003 | Pages 518-521
Technical Paper | Fusion Energy - Plasma Engineering, Heating, and Current Drive | doi.org/10.13182/FST03-A389
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The transport and net loss of cyclotron radiation for burning plasmas represented by the ITER, FIRE and IGNITOR designs are assessed using the CYTRAN radiation transport code. Although cyclotron radiation might be expected to be a bigger issue in the higher field devices (FIRE and IGNITOR), the reference operating conditions in those devices are at lower temperatures so that the relative importance is nearly constant for all three. At the reference operating conditions for each of these devices, the net energy loss from cyclotron radiation is about 10% of the alpha power, and the axial loss is typically about 15% of the local alpha power density. If the same fusion power is generated at higher temperature and lower density than the reference operating points (as may be the case in advanced confinement modes), both the net and axial loss fractions strongly increase and are more competitive with other energy transport processes. The increase is much stronger for the high field devices where the axial loss can approach the local alpha energy production rate for T(0) ~ 30 keV. However, if the temperature increases at constant density (as in a thermal excursion), cyclotron radiation loss remains an almost constant fraction of the alpha production rate. This implies that it will not make a significant contribution to thermal stabilization. However, these and other calculations of cyclotron radiation transport are sensitive to assumptions of reflection, plasma geometry and profile shapes. Therefore, the effect of cyclotron radiation on operating conditions and burn dynamics will undoubtedly be a generic issue that any burning plasma will have to address.