American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Publications / Journals / Fusion Science and Technology / Volume 4 / Number 2P2

d-d Tokamak Reactor Assessment

D. C. Baxter, A. E. Dabiri, D. Dobrott, J. E. Glancy, H. Gurol, W. K. Hagan, J. B. McBride, S. Tamor, R. N. Cherdack

Fusion Science and Technology / Volume 4 / Number 2P2 / September 1983 / Pages 246-251

Alternate Fuels / dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST83-A22876

A quantitative comparison of the physics and technology requirements, and the cost and safety performance of a d-d tokamak relative to a d-t tokamak has been performed. The first wall/blanket and energy recovery cycle for the d-d tokamak is simpler, and has a higher efficiency than the d-t tokamak. In most other technology areas (such as magnets, RF, vacuum, etc.) d-d requirements are more severe and the systems are more complex, expensive and may involve higher technical risk than d-t tokamak systems. Tritium technology for processing the plasma exhaust, and tritium refueling technology are required for d-d reactors, but no tritium containment around the blanket or heat transport system is needed. Cost studies show that for high plasma beta and high magnetic field the cost of electricity from d-d and d-t tokamaks is comparable. Safety analysis shows less radioactivity in a d-d reactor but larger amounts of stored energy and thus higher potential for energy release. Consequences of all postulated d-d accidents are significantly smaller than those from d-t reactor tritium releases.

 
Questions or comments about the site? Contact the ANS Webmaster.
advertisement