ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
WIPP improves utility shaft safety, begins infrastructure project
Harrison Western Shaft Sinkers (HWSS), the company drilling a new utility shaft at the Department of Energy’s Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in New Mexico, has retained a safety culture expert following a near-miss accident in the shaft late last year. The safety expert will conduct monthly facilitated discussions with crews working on the shaft to reinforce expectations for identifying concerns regarding unsafe circumstances, according to a recent report by the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (DNFSB).
R. Leonard Myatt, Nicolai N. Martovetsky, Charlotte Barbier, Kevin D. Freudenberg
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 64 | Number 2 | August 2013 | Pages 161-167
ITER | Proceedings of the Twentieth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (TOFE-2012) (Part 1), Nashville, Tennessee, August 27-31, 2012 | doi.org/10.13182/FST13-A18072
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ITER central solenoid (CS) is wound from cable-in-conduit-conductor (CICC) and cooled by supercritical Helium (He) delivered to ~120 inner diameter (ID) turns through integrally welded "inlets." The flow to each inlet splits and passes through two pancakes, exiting at outlets. While both the He supply and return points (outlets) require penetrating the conduit wall, the inlets reside in the highest stress field, and thus become the more critical structural element.The CS Conceptual Design Review (CRD) reference He inlet design has a long, narrow slot in the inside diameter (ID) turn wall with pencil-tip shaped ends. This shape is optimized in order to minimize the hoop stress concentration. The slot length is chosen to expose each of the six superconducting (SC) sub-cables to the He cooling supply. Implementing this design at 120 inlet sites requires substantial machining and welding operations where even virgin conduit has minimal structural margin.A design space exploration produces numerous inlet options. One configuration emerges as the new reference configuration: the oblong, heavy-wall boss. It addresses all of the critical issues: bi-axial stress field, pressure drop and sub-cable flow uniformity, manufacturing costs (complexities and risks) and in-service robustness (least invasive, greatest margin).Finite element (FE) simulations are presented which highlight the results of the optimization and evaluation process.