ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
October 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Russia withdraws from 25-year-old weapons-grade plutonium agreement
Russia’s lower house of Parliament, the State Duma, approved a measure to withdraw from a 25-year-old agreement with the United States to cut back on the leftover plutonium from Cold War–era nuclear weapons.
Kenji Yokoyama (JAEA), Takanori Kitada (Osaka Univ)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 1221-1230
As a method to improve the design prediction accuracy by utilizing integral experimental data, the conventional cross-section adjustment method (CA) based on Bayes the- orem is widely used. On the other hand, propositions of the generalized bias factor method (GB) in 2006 and the extended bias factor method (EB) in 2007 have stimulated theoretical study in this field. Subsequently, several new cross-section adjustment methods were proposed: the ex- tended cross-section adjustment method (EA); the cross- section adjustment methods based on minimum variance unbiased estimation (MVUE), which include the MVUE- based rigorous EA (MREA) and the MVUE-based rigorous CA (MRCA); and the dimension-reduced cross-section ad- justment method (DRCA). In the present paper, we applied these methods to a real-scale problem of design prediction accuracy evaluation for a large-size sodium cooled fast re- actor and compared their performances. From these re- sults, we discuss a proper use of these design methods.