ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Shifting the paradigm of supply chain
Chad Wolf
When I began my nuclear career, I was coached up in the nuclear energy culture of the day to “run silent, run deep,” a mindset rooted in the U.S. Navy’s submarine philosophy. That was the norm—until Fukushima.
The nuclear renaissance that many had envisioned hit a wall. The focus shifted from expansion to survival. Many utility communications efforts pivoted from silence to broadcast, showcasing nuclear energy’s elegance and reliability. Nevertheless, despite being clean baseload 24/7 power that delivered a 90 percent capacity factor or higher, nuclear energy was painted as risky and expensive (alongside energy policies and incentives that favored renewables).
Economics became a driving force threatening to shutter nuclear power. The Delivering the Nuclear Promise initiative launched in 2015 challenged the industry to sustain high performance yet cut costs by up to 30 percent.
Hsoung-Wei Chou, Pin-Chiun Huang, Yuh-Ming Ferng
Nuclear Technology | Volume 207 | Number 5 | May 2021 | Pages 735-749
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1796091
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The structural integrity of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is a crucial issue for an operating nuclear power plant, especially in the beltline region, which suffers the highest neutron irradiation. Owing to its capability of considering parameters based on statistical distributions and provision of objective risk-informed results, the probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) method is widely used in evaluating the structural integrity of RPVs. However, the flaw characteristics used for PFM analysis are mainly derived from particular vessel inspection information such as from the Pressure Vessel Research User Facility and Shoreham vessels, which may not be able to truly represent the vessel-specific condition of an analyzed RPV. In this work, the Bayesian inference, which combines prior flaw data with new inspection results as well as uncertainties, is used to develop posterior vessel-specific flaw distributions. Then, the updated flaw model is used for PFM analysis to investigate the effects on the fracture probability assessment of RPVs subjected to pressurized thermal shocks (PTSs). Considering the updated flaws based on the inspection data, the PFM analysis result could be more realistic to predict the fracture risks of RPVs during operation.
