ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Ethwart Pollmann, Joachim Schulze, Dieter Kreuter
Nuclear Technology | Volume 108 | Number 3 | December 1994 | Pages 350-360
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT94-A35017
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In a boiling water reactor, nuclear-thermal-hydraulic instabilities can occur if extreme operating conditions prevail. In various nuclear reactors, stability measurements have been carried out during which the location and the shape of the stability threshold was measured at a certain exposure point during the cycle. Earlier sensitivity studies have already shown that fuel assembly parameters have only a small influence on stability compared with plant parameters. The influence of plant parameters has been verified by measurements that were carried out in the German boiling water reactor Würgassen every 4 to 6 weeks during cycle 14. The results of the measurements showed for the single-loop operation point (least stable point in the core map) a strong variation of the stability threshold power during the cycle. From the beginning of cycle to the middle of cycle, the stability threshold power decreases by ∼16% (relative). After the minimum was reached, the stability threshold power increased again. Smaller variations of the stability threshold power in the core map at natural circulation indicate that not only the stability threshold varies during the cycle, but also the shape of the stability threshold is changed. Analyses with the code system STAIF have shown that the stability behavior during the cycle can clearly be correlated with the variation of the axial and radial power density profile due to control rod maneuvering and fuel burnup. Furthermore, it could be shown that for the estimation of the neutronic feedback not only the density coefficient must be taken into account but also the void variation caused by a power perturbation.