ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
MARVEL team shares lessons learned through microreactor development
On June 1 at the American Nuclear Society’s Annual Conference in Denver, Colo., a team from Idaho National Laboratory presented a session titled “Lessons Learned from MARVEL Reactor Fabrication.” The presentation highlighted challenges that arose as they moved from design to manufacturing and assembly, with a focus on reactor part fabrication, Stirling engine implementation, and reactivity control system development.
Constantine P. Tzanos
Nuclear Technology | Volume 77 | Number 3 | June 1987 | Pages 263-278
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A33966
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A model was developed for faster than real-time liquid-metal fast breeder reactor core transient analysis for purposes of continuous on-line data validation, plant state verification, and fault identification. The basic feature of this model is the use of a nodal approximation for the coolant, cladding, and fuel temperatures that gives adequately accurate power and temperature predictions with very few axial nodes. In applications of this methodology to fast loss-of-flow and overpower transients, computation times of about one-thirtieth of the real transient time per thermal-hydraulic channel were obtained. The predicted coolant and cladding temperature distributions were practically identical to those resulting from detailed finite difference computations. The predicted fuel temperatures differed by ∼1% or less from those obtained from the same finite difference computations. The analysis of the Transient Reactor Test Facility experiment TS-1C and the Experimental Breeder Reactor II experiment SHRT-17 showed very good agreement between model predictions and measurements.