ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
July 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Hanford proposes “decoupled” approach to remediating former chem lab
Working with the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Energy has revised its planned approach to remediating contaminated soil underneath the Chemical Materials Engineering Laboratory (commonly known as the 324 Building) at the Hanford Site in Washington state. The soil, which has been designated the 300-296 waste site, became contaminated as the result of a spill of highly radioactive material in the mid-1980s.
Maximiliano Dalinger, William Walters
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 1 | April 2025 | Pages S754-S764
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2328944
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Monte Carlo codes are the most accurate way to solve the neutronics in a reactor core but can be computationally expensive, especially for when feedback effects are considered or for transient calculations. In this paper, we use the fission matrix (FM) method to perform static and transient calculations with point-kinetics equations and a quasi-static model for an adiabatic transient with feedback. This was applied to a three-dimensional model of the Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) experimental reactor using the Monte Carlo code Serpent for reference calculations and to generate fission matrix databases (FMDBs). In previous works, FMDBs were generated with uniform fuel temperature profiles. Here, we analyze the use of FMDBs with nonuniform temperature profiles, for static and transient calculations. For static calculations, comparison between Serpent and the FM method using nonuniform and uniform FMDBs showed maximum differences in multiplication factors of 57.0 and 77.9 pcm, respectively. For the fission source distribution, comparisons showed maximum root-mean-square differences of 1.10% and 4.89% for nonuniform and uniform FMDBs, respectively. Similar results were obtained when using homogenized databases. Therefore, using nonuniform FMDBs produces a better approximation than uniform databases. For transient calculations, comparisons between both database sets showed differences of 0.9% and −1.8% for the peak and final total power.