ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Growth beyond megawatts
Hash Hashemianpresident@ans.org
When talking about growth in the nuclear sector, there can be a somewhat myopic focus on increasing capacity from year to year. Certainly, we all feel a degree of excitement when new projects are announced, and such announcements are undoubtedly a reflection of growth in the field, but it’s important to keep in mind that growth in nuclear has many metrics and takes many forms.
Nuclear growth—beyond megawatts—also takes the form of increasing international engagement. That engagement looks like newcomer countries building their nuclear sectors for the first time. It also looks like countries with established nuclear sectors deepening their connections and collaborations. This is one of the reasons I have been focused throughout my presidency on bringing more international members and organizations into the fold of the American Nuclear Society.
Emeline Rosier, Li Mao, Richard Sanchez, Luiz Leal, Igor Zmijarevic
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 199 | Number 1 | April 2025 | Pages S121-S134
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2340143
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The legacy subgroup method of the APOLLO3® code, denoted the SG-GR-383g method in this paper, relies on the fine structure equation solved by the means of the General Resonance model and of the mathematical probability tables (MPTs) that are computed on the fly for the resonant mixture. Because of the use of these MPTs, a fine energy structure of 383 groups has to be employed.
In our recent work, with the intention of decreasing computational time, a subgroup method adapted to coarse-group calculations has been implemented in APOLLO3. It is based on the use of physical probability tables (PPTs), taking into account the mixture treatment, and on the Intermediate Resonance model to derive the subgroup equations, as well as the application of the Superhomogenization correction to ensure the preservation of the reaction rates in a multigroup calculation. This method, denoted SG-IR-69g in this paper, uses a 69-coarse-group energy mesh. This paper presents a comparison of the SG-IR-69g method with the legacy SG-GR-383g method, taking as reference the continuous-energy Monte Carlo TRIPOLI-4® calculations on test cases of 3 × 3 pin cells, with a central cell being either a water hole or a Gd-UO2 pin cell surrounded by UO2 pin cells. Similar accuracy on the multiplication factor was obtained for both the SG-GR-383g and SG-IR-69g methods, although more error compensations were found in the multigroup reaction rates of the latter. Even though the calculation of PPTs is more expensive than that of the mathematical ones, overall the SG-IR-69g method is more time efficient thanks to the decrease in the number of energy groups.
